
Dear New Yorker, if you’re going to do a feature piece on Doctor Who and creating TV mythologies and cult fans, please don’t get a writer who acknowledges that “I haven’t watched Davies’s version” or that in its pre-2005 incarnation, “its themes were rarely emotional”. I’ve not watched Classic Who either, but as far as I know, the show didn’t survive simply because of its “pure sci-fi obsessions, abstract questions of how society is organized and the line between humans and machines”.
At least get someone who is a fan in order to talk about what is essentially fandom, instead of someone who’s talking down to us, who’s watching DW and saying “OMG look at this shiny new thing I found!” when really, it’s been around for YEARS now. And don’t serve us this kind of platitude, where “the fan’s experience of loyalty and loss is its own, legitimate form of romantic love.” o.O
Just, ugh, no.
The Mary Sue defines what it means to be a geek — and I couldn’t have said it better myself.
(via)
(via professorspork)
RIP: Jan Berenstain, who co-created the beloved Berenstain Bears book series with her husband Stan, passed away Friday after suffering a stroke. She was 88.
Jan and Stan — who passed away in 2005 — published the first Berenstain Bears book, The Big Honey Hunt, in 1962. They were encouraged and assisted by the head of Random House’s Beginner Books imprint, Theodor Geisel (better known as Dr. Seuss).
The couple went on to produce over 300 books in the series, and have those books translated into over 20 languages.
[tmz.]
“Today’s science fiction urges us to ask similar questions about governments that force women and men to rear children that they don’t want, cannot afford, and who require work that the adults around them simply cannot perform. What kind of world are we creating when humans cannot prevent unwanted children from beng born? More to the point, we have to ask what those children will think of us when they realize how much more political effort has been put into regulating reproduction than into child-rearing, schools, and activities for young people.”
Most scientists, on achieving high office, keep their public remarks to the bland and reassuring. Last week Nina Fedoroff, the president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), broke ranks in a spectacular manner.
She confessed that she was now “scared to death” by the anti-science movement that was spreading, uncontrolled, across the US and the rest of the western world.
“We are sliding back into a dark era,” she said. “And there seems little we can do about it. I am profoundly depressed at just how difficult it has become merely to get a realistic conversation started on issues such as climate change or genetically modified organisms.”
As Fedoroff pointed out, university and government researchers are hounded for arguing that rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are changing the climate. Their emails are hacked while Facebook campaigns call for their dismissal from their posts, calls that are often backed by rightwing politicians. At the last Republican party debate in Florida, Rick Santorum insisted he should be the presidential nominee simply because he had cottoned on earlier than his rivals Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney to the “hoax” of global warming.
“Those of us who grew up in the sixties, when we put men on the Moon, now have to watch as every Republican candidate for this year’s presidential election denies the science behind climate change and evolution. That is a staggering state of affairs and it is very worrying,” said Professor Naomi Oreskes, of the University of California, San Diego.
Oreskes is co-author, with Erik Conway, of Merchants of Doubt, an investigation into the links between corporate business interests and campaigns in the US aimed at blocking the introduction of environmental and medical measures such as bans on smoking and the use of DDT, laws to limit acid rain, legislation to end the depletion of ozone in the atmosphere and attempts to curb carbon dioxide emissions.
In each case, legislation was delayed by years, sometimes decades, thanks to the activities of a variety of foundations – such as the Heartland Institute – which are backed by energy companies such as Exxon and billionaires like Charles Koch.
These institutions, acting as covers for major energy corporations, are responsible for the onslaught that has deeply lowered the reputation of science in many people’s minds in America. This has come in the form of personal attacks on the reputations of scientists and television adverts that undermine environment laws. The Environmental Protection Agency, which is responsible for blocking mining and drilling proposals that might harm threatened species or habitats, has become a favourite target.
(via aspiringhermit)
I am sorry our culture has treated women so poorly for so long that suffering abuse to receive celebrity attention seems like a fair and reasonable trade. We have failed you, utterly.
- Drew McWeeny, in an excellent article of how and why FanFiction is changing Hollywood for the better (via aaronbleyaert)
——-
Behold the power of fic! If The Muppets can be construed as fanfic (strictly taking the definition of something created by fans, in this case Jason Segel and Nicolas Stoller) then the 2005 Doctor Who reboot is also fanfic, and this is blowing my mind.
(via gallifreygal)
(via gallifreygal)